March 20, 2009, 04:50 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Character Info
Gourdegoule
80 Undead Warlock
Dalaran (français)
Euro
PvE
Guild: Ombre Phoenix
Profile:
Talent Spec: 0/56/15
|
Re: I Need A Better Macro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cormanthor
for the majority of my raiding, I use four spells on bosses. I have a similar build (0/41/30), so this may work better for you.
Code:
#showtooltip
/petattack [mod:shift]
/cast [mod:shift] Curse of Agony
/castsequence [nomod] reset=target/combat/17 Immolate, Corruption, Incinerate,
Incinerate, Incinerate, Incinerate, Incinerate, Incinerate, Incinerate,
Incinerate, Incinerate, Incinerate
|
Pardon me to jump into your discussion, I am considering, with the 3.1, to evolve towards a demo/destru spec as you (don't know yet if I do the 51/20 or 41/30, I got different logical and clear advices in a thread I posted) are, could you explain to the casual player I am why spamming Incinerate instead of Shadowbolt once the dots are applied ?
Does Emberstorm make Incinerate that better than SB as long Immolate is running ? With guildies we calculated that raw dps, if you have 5 points in Bane, is still in favor of Shadowbolt versus Immolate/Incinerate, as long you have at least 139 spell power, he :-) We also calculated that -but this will change now with the 3.1- contrary to a popular belief, Soul Fire is less dps than Shadowbolt if you have Bane and at least 973 spell power.
Here the stats to illustrate our calcs :
("Fléau" means Bane, "base" means without Bane, "SB" is Shadowbolt, "SF" is obviously Soulfire).
Well, to summarize my question, is Emberstorm the point which makes Incinerate more dpsing than SB ? So I assume a 51/20 build would keep SB as main nuke after dot refreshs ?
I hope you are not offended I trolled a little bit your original topic about the macro 
|
|
|