| Pets! Imps, Felhunters and Doomguards Oh my! Anything and everything relating to the Warlock Minions. |
 |
October 30, 2009, 02:34 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
|
behind on the pet usage for locks
so during BC my lock was my main and for wrath I re-rolled a Paladin. Took forever to get my warlock to 80 but now he is, and I haven't been keeping up on all the warlock changes since he's just a profession alt but I've been thinking going back to him for my main however I'm confused on why Blizz doesn't allow us to Sacrifice our pets anymore for increased damage? Like back in BC it was typical in a raid to sacrifice the Succubus for increased Shadowbolt damage or Sac Imp for fire damage. Anyhow, curious on why we can no longer do this... I hate having a pet out for pve and want to kill it. sorry for the wall of text thanks in advance! |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
October 30, 2009, 04:56 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
|
Re: behind on the pet usage for locks
Because too many people were just sacing their pets and not using them. Blizzard didn't want a lock to have to spec into the demonology tree just to sac their pet. It's called the demonology tree for a reason ( not the sac for buffs tree ). |
|
|
|
|
October 30, 2009, 06:07 PM
|
#3 (permalink) |
 
Status: Subscriber
Character Info
Dyson 80 Human Warlock Scilla US PvP Guild: Eden Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: 0/13/58 |
Re: behind on the pet usage for locks
A demon pet is also one of the defining features of a warlock versus a mage. It was kind of silly to have a spec where you would never have a pet out |
|
|
|
|
October 30, 2009, 06:29 PM
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
|
Re: behind on the pet usage for locks
Blizz is working on getting the pets to buff us while they are alive, not in death. Right now the best example is the Imp buffing Destro dps through Empowered Imp. 3.3 was looking like it was going to do the same with the Felhunter for Affliction but they since yanked all that out, but who knows. And the Felguard is still the pet for Demo as far as I know. |
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009, 01:07 AM
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Character Info
Lùcifér 79 Blood Elf Warlock Dunemaul US PvP Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: Duel D/D |
Re: behind on the pet usage for locks
Quote:
 Felguards Rock!
__________________
Im the noob your mother warned you about. LIVE backwards |
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009, 01:55 AM
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Character Info
iamultimo 80 Orc Warlock Barthilas US PvP Guild: Serendipity Profile: Talent Spec: 0/56/15 |
Re: behind on the pet usage for locks
Quote:
A warlock to me was never a warlock with just SB spam and no pet. Now if a warlock doesn't have his pet out his dps will suffer. I mean, even the tier 9 set bonus is aimed at pets buffing us  Personally i think the reason blizzard did this was so we aren't just another mage. Its just not as demonic to summon a pet then kill it for self gain. I love my pets
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009, 09:42 AM
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
|
Re: behind on the pet usage for locks
Quote:
__________________
Life is empty, life is meaningless. When we take a life, we aren't taking anything of value. Warlocks are killers. That's all we do, that's all we are. There are no poets in the bitter business. |
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009, 03:50 PM
|
#8 (permalink) | |
Status: Dot, 'Lock and Drop it!
Character Info
Cormanthor 80 Human Warlock Gnomeregan US PvE Guild: Knights who say Ni Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: Various |
Re: behind on the pet usage for locks
Quote:
__________________
Some days it just not worth chewing through the restraints |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| locks, Pet, usage |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
