![]() |
Don't show ads... |
|
|||||||
| Pets! Imps, Felhunters and Doomguards Oh my! Anything and everything relating to the Warlock Minions. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() |
Crowd Control: Seduce vs VW Off-Tank
The group I normally run with is a warrior, priest, rogue, and shaman. This means that in many cases I'm called on to deal with crowd control. What I've found is that having the voidwalker off-tank a mob is far easier then chain-seducing. The main reason is that seduce breaks so often and the succubus is so much more fragile than the voidwalker. Anyone else experience the same thing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() |
Re: Crowd Control: Seduce vs VW Off-Tank
I was in UD strat last night and I was called on to chain seduce one of the necros. I suggested off tanking with the void and they said they'd rather have the seduce. I tried to explain that if the mobs are shadow resistant, or if anyone used aoe, the seduce breaks. And it did. Repeatedly. I couldn't seem to keep seduce on. Very frustrating. I agree with the OP. Off tanking, especially with MD, is much better than chain seduce. RotV heal for that one extra hit ftw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Lurker
![]()
Character Info
Baranar 60 Orc Warlock Hyjal US PvE |
Re: Crowd Control: Seduce vs VW Off-Tank
In instances where many adds are likely, I tend to pull out my VW, have a priest shield him and sac him for the bonus, and keep him on passive. When the healer pulls the adds I send the VW over and do a suffering, which is a huge aggromagnet, leaving the priest unharmed. Also, I've found using VW who's been doing torment to a mob 4 or 5 times makes it .... impossible .... for a warrior to pull the mob off, even with taunt. Great offtank IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() |
Re: Crowd Control: Seduce vs VW Off-Tank
When I was level 50, my VW could hold absolutely NO aggro. Turned out I hadn't bought new spells for him since level 20. <3
VW offtanking is probably easier because you don't have to repick your target to re-seduce. And yeh, always put CoS up, it lengthens the duration. =) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]()
Character Info
Firedrake 60 Undead Warlock Xavius Euro PvP |
Re: Crowd Control: Seduce vs VW Off-Tank
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
NOT IN THE FACE!!!!
![]()
Character Info
Gritz 80 Orc Warlock Eldre'Thalas US PvE Guild: Fate Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: 57/14/0 |
Re: Crowd Control: Seduce vs VW Off-Tank
if I recall correctly, CoS only helps the initial seduce stick, and has no effect on the chance to break early; as opposed to fear, which is not a binary spell.
-Gritz |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered
![]() |
Re: Crowd Control: Seduce vs VW Off-Tank
Voidy seems very effective if he's the first one to aggro a mob, but he seems much less effective at pulling a mob that someone has already minorly slashed. So if your group allows you to send him off first he can easily blow smoke around and keep things focused on him. However, if your group likes to dive into the fray ahead of you maybe seduce will fit their style a little better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() |
Re: Crowd Control: Seduce vs VW Off-Tank
The point that I discovered last few days is, I simply never have my VW out. I do have my succubus out because I'm MD/Ruin specced. So when we pull too many mobs, I quicky seduce 1...
The good thing about seduce is that it's not aggro based... with your VW you just have to hope it can aggro more than the healer does. |
|
|
|