![]() |
Don't show ads... |
|
|||||||
| Site Related Site Updates, Announcements and Suggestions. Please take the time to read posts put in this section to ensure you are kept up to date and to contribute your thoughts and feedback. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
![]() |
Library Try #3!
After two weeks, a couple of polls and entire weekend dedicated to the cause, I think I've finally settled on a Library layout that not only provides better functionality than it's original single forum form, but more importantly, looks good! In it's original forum form, the Library worked ok, however with more and more guides being submitted, things were being lost easily and new members were completely unaware of the existence of a couple of crucial guides. So I went on the hunt for a solution...
The first solution provided a fantastic layout as well as a few little added extras, but because it completely separated the guides from the forum, the ability to inform members of updates and new replies was gone. Instead of being to use the 'New Posts' feature, users were required to do a separate search for new replies to guides, which in my opinion, is no good. That and a lot of new comers became aware of guides by seeing them replied to and showing up on the front page 'latest threads' module. Then of course there was the big thumbs down that I think everyone agrees on, and that's the very clunky, very chunky 'middle' page between the index and the guides themselves. Bleugh. And this doesn't mention the biggest deal breaker for me, which was every single outbound (and a few internal) links to the guides were automatically broken. Eep! Liking the 'category' layout so much, I fiddled with the forum Library and replicated that part pretty well, but of course it didn't have some of the features of the external library - the featured guides, 'my guides' and the ability to save guides as drafts. But, it did mean that every link was once again working, and new replies and threads showed up in both the 'New Post' function as well as the front page. But, I still wasn't 100% happy... After an entire weekend of fiddling however, I think I've found a nice warm happy place. What we have now is...
Still in the works (ie I haven't kinked out the bugs yet) will be multi-page guides which will come with their own content menus, as well as the ability to tag your favourite guides similar to the 'My Guides' feature of the first Library attempt. There's probably a few more issues here and there that will crop up, to be expected. Please let me know of any bugs you find via reply to this thread. As always, feedback always welcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
![]() ![]()
Character Info
Pernicious 80 Blood Elf Warlock Dark Iron US PvP Guild: Dire Beef Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: 0/51/20 |
Re: Library Try #3!
Wow! Somebody's been busy. I've taken a quick look and so far I don't see anything that I don't like. Nice job Akasha!!!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Subscriber
![]() ![]()
Character Info
Argusi 80 Blood Elf Warlock Firetree US PvP Guild: Diversity Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: 0/20/51 |
Re: Library Try #3!
Now this is good stuff. I like it a lot. Would you want to see if there is a way to bump up better rated or most thanked guides? Good job, Akasha and you better go check your bookshelf with the games! You've been busy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]()
Character Info
Nereida 80 Human Warlock Dawnbringer US PvE Guild: Fates Defiance Profile: Blizzard Armory |
Re: Library Try #3!
Loving what you've done with it. Looks like you found a way to give us the best of both worlds. Great work Akasha! Now go play yourself a little WoW or play with that adorable sweetheart of yours. You deserve some rest.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]()
Character Info
Smyth 70 Undead Warlock Blackhand US PvE Guild: Paradigm Noctourne Talent Spec: 0/45/16 |
Re: Library Try #3!
I like it!
![]() The results of your efforts are very impressive. I appreciate your hard work...you did a great job! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Re: Library Try #3!
Excellent feedback! I had a really scary thought at 2am this morning that people were going to be 'eh, its ok' lol...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Haatom ain't skeert!
![]()
Character Info
Cormanthor 80 Human Warlock Gnomeregan US PvE Guild: Knights who say Ni Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: 0/41/30 |
Re: Library Try #3!
Outstanding job! I'd rate the new library at 5 SoulStones! (Stars are for druids)
/loves what you've done with the place! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
pesky beast
![]() ![]()
Character Info
Snacker 70 Gnome Warlock Zirkel des Cenarius Euro RP Guild: Heavens Fall Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: 27/34/0 |
Re: Library Try #3!
Looks fantastic. Thanks a lot Akasha
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
![]() ![]()
Character Info
Pernicious 80 Blood Elf Warlock Dark Iron US PvP Guild: Dire Beef Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: 0/51/20 |
Re: Library Try #3!
Ok yeah, been cruisin through the library and only came across one issue that I can mention.
If you were to leap all the way back out to the home page and scroll through the navigation it isn't obvious which link will take you to the library. The "Warlock Guides" Graphic will take you there but I find it odd that none of the other graphic navigation headers (Warlock Info, Spells & Talents, Pet Info, etc...) are click able, yet that one is. I suggest moving the "Submit a Guide" link under the Warlock Guides header, and adding a new link that says "Guide Library" under it as well so that everything is consistent. This way the navigation will be divided up into sections with subsections containing the links. Thats a very small nit picky kinda thing. But it's the best I could come up with when looking the site over for bugs... I figure, since I'm becoming known as the bug finder around here I'd do my part. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Destruction Warlock
![]()
Character Info
Lavath 80 Blood Elf Warlock Shadow Council US RP Guild: Syk Profile: Blizzard Armory Talent Spec: 0/14/47 |
Re: Library Try #3!
Ok.
Yes, this looks much better... and really functional too! Nicely done! ![]() |
|
|
|