GC talks about the change to Infernals in PTR patch 3.3 - Page 2 - The Warlocks Den

Please Register to Remove these Ads

The Warlocks Den - WoW Warlock Discussions » News » Latest Warlock News, Blue posts and more! » GC talks about the change to Infernals in PTR patch 3.3

Latest Warlock News, Blue posts and more! News posts highlighted for the front page and moved here for discussion. These are usually 'hot topics' or site updates.

Page 2 of 2

Share / Bookmark

Thread Tools

November 05, 2009, 09:09 AM

#11 (permalink)

Gelbreazu

Character Info
Gelbreazu
80 Undead Warlock
suramar US PvE
Guild: seventh column
Talent Spec: 0/14/57

Re: GC talks about the change to Infernals in PTR patch 3.3

Quote:

And I totally agree with the summoning. Its such a pain in the butt. As was said, its hard enough to get two people to summon HS. I love how 10 people will just stand there with out clicking. /sigh

so true, last time i tried to summon a DG i hear this over vent ,
"whats he doing?"
"not sure, we already got candy"
"maybe someone missed it?"
"could be a summoning stone..."

sometimes i really wonder

Sponsored Links

November 05, 2009, 10:30 AM

#12 (permalink)

dethkrik

Character Info
Dethkrik
80 Blood Elf Warlock
Turalyon US PvE
Guild: War Machine

Re: GC talks about the change to Infernals in PTR patch 3.3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasztam

That wasn't very professional, Ghostcrawler, and this isn't the first time you have complained about our complaining. While it's true that most QQ is just that YOU might consider that the sentiment doesn't come from nowhere and does sometimes have merit. You might further consider that this is your job and comport yourself accordingly. You might finally consider that if you replied with more definite answers concerning your long-term plans rather than ambigous 'we are aware of the issue' garbage posts then you would hear less whining.

Seriously? Have you ever read threads in the class forums? There is the odd good post, but the vast majority are filled with illogical rants full of spelling and grammatical errors that quickly spiral into some sort of off topic gibberish. I can't imagine being GC or any other member of the team trying to sift through all of these post every day to see if someone actually has a valid logical point of view. Can you imagine going to your job and then having a forum you hop on each day with 100s (1000s?) of post saying how fail you or the people you work with are?

As to the 'soon' or 'we are aware of the issue' replies, can you imagine how much worse things would get if they replied with, 'we are planning on implementing A, B, and C to fix this issue' then, patch day comes and only B makes it live. Instead of being grateful that the issue was fixed you would have countless post crying about how A and C didn't make it live. I'm sure they have 75% of their plans for each class figured out, but that other 25% leaves so much variation that saying one way or another what they have 'planned' is just opening things up for half the community to be upset/disappointed.

But serously, how lame is it that people think they have the right to QQ endlessly about what they think Blizz (and usually its aimed at GC) is doing wrong, but then when GC calls people out for not being constructive or objective in their post they get offended?

November 05, 2009, 06:41 PM

#13 (permalink)

Elricc

Character Info
Elricc
80 Human Warlock
Nagrand Oceania PvE
Guild: The Silver Hand
Talent Spec: Destro

Re: GC talks about the change to Infernals in PTR patch 3.3

Quote:

Originally Posted by fizboz

You might also consider that if you guys responded with fewer "Finally replied to a warlock issue" and "Do they even understand warlocks?" garbage posts that we might respond more often.

Hmm so millions of mage tears & rogue moans on the forums about nerf fear didn't get them both buffed & us nerfed?

I don't have any time for GC-Constructive critisism makes him run & hide. If he doesn't have an answer or want to answer he makes it all our fault.

__________________
If you ask a question that you don't want an answer to. Expect an answer you don't want to hear.

Page 2 of 2

Bookmarks